Planck Foundation | Energy Sciences

Planck Foundation advocates regarding energy sciences:

combining economic sciences and monetary sciences into energy finance science (delivering a comprehensive model)

an analysis of the total energy demand of each product/process (making them less vulnerable for energy price rise)

smart facets focused globalization (as a replacement for easy/cheap energy driven overall globalization)

the peakenergy/peakresources theory (much of the earth’s easy/cheap to explore energy/resources are yet exhausted)

research on real energy price calculations (inclusive all socialized costs, like subsidies and military expenditures)

a change from molecules to electrons in energy exploitation/transport/use (power as basis of the next energy era)

fuelless photovoltaic exploration for every roof/wall/building (as a method to deliver energy in locations of demand)

fuelless geothermal exploration of the hotspots in each continent (as a easy/cheap replacement for oil/coal/nuclear)

geothermal can be faster deployed than nuclear (geothermal can be build in just one year, nuclear takes 20 years)

geothermal is better than nuclear: it doesn't require fuel (enhanced geothermal is just sea water / earth core driven)

the use of geothermal energy to produce for PV needed energy intensive ingots (embedded geothermal power export)

local low temperature geothermal can be deployed all around the world (for almost fuel free cooling/heating)

local low temperature geothermal shouldn't perforate local/regional sub soil water basins (sub soil water is valuable)

coal will become very soon the most expensive power generation fuel (huge global demand will explode the coal price)

in situ coal exploration (underground coal to gas) will be used to explore difficult coal resources without mining

CO2 emissions of the developed world will be reduced automatically due increasing energy prices (market mechanism)

underground CO2 storage projects are economic negative (adding no productivity, just delivering vague services)

underground CO2 storage is advocated by the hydro carbon industry as it is an additional source of revenues

the CO2 consumption by flora may be up to 45% more than the values used in current used climate models (link)

CO2 is just an atmospheric flora photosynthesis fertilizer (any greenhouses operating farmer can give supporting data)

climate change is of all times (Greenland used to be green, so CC and has other driving factors than man made CO2)

pricing CO2 just delivers an 'open for abuse' manipulative mechanism in the energy market (zero economic benefits)

renewable energy harvesting facilities investments have a by nature guaranteed ROI (these guarantees are AAAA)

renewable energy harvesting facilities investments have fuelless power production (fuel costs can't undermine the ROIs)

huge steam based renewable energy harvesting facilities in the desert (sand=silica=glass+concrete = costprice -75%)

desert energy harvesting attached seawater condense watered farms (frozen exports of multiple harvests a year)

local/decentral power production that reduces the transport load on power networks severely (making space for HVDC)

transition a part of national hvdc powerlines into continental networks of efficient hvdc powerlines (low CAPEX+OPEX)

new HVDC tech delivers a more power transport capacity on the same copper or aluminium lines than old HVAC tech

as electrons will replace molecules international power lines will become important (and redundant design of them too)

geothermal, desertech, wind and solar will create demand for low transport cost international power infrastructure

power infra should be both full geographic redundant and full decentral in design/capacity so blackouts will be reduced

the effects of a strong solar originated EMP in a digital era are totally underestimated (it can wipe out powerinfra)

power infra should have off-line spare equipment in faraday stored (for replacement in case of EMP caused meltdowns)

nuclear fission plants can run out of control by lack of cooling if (artificial or solar) EMP knocks out grid connections

nuclear fission operations should halt their operations for some day if there is a chance for a carrington event (link)

nuclear fission as an underdeveloped (V 0.X) not round type of nuclear energy (privatizing profits, socializing costs)

nuclear fusion as the right nuclear model (virtual magnetic building hosted with lasers crosspoint ignition: not ITER)

the magnetic sun model will lead to a new nuclear 2.0 (magnetic) based energy generation technology for mankind

a design for energy extensive information/communication technologies (full online html5 based virtual screen technology)

due new info-com technologies commuting can be rated as time/energy waste (huge new time/energy resource)

total irrelevance of energy conservation in light tech (as light only consumes less than 1% of our energy consumption)

seawater mining will become very important as we learn that without large energy imputs (bacteria, catalysts, etc)

sunspot quantity direct effects sun based energy models like PV, CPS and wind (as wind indirectly also is sun driven)

pricing of carbon hydros is not based on supply/demand but on stakeholders manipulation (going short / long / to war)

pricing of carbon hydros and the faith in/of the dollar are very interconnected since the petrodollar (1973)

PeakEnergy is more a price updriving dogma cultivated by stakeholders than an actual reality (scarcity drives prices up)

a microwave oil well device will make very thick oil commercial explorable (and unlocks huge oil fields by that)

a microwave tar sand device reduces the water demand and environmental impact of tar sand exploration severely

tar sand to power technology eliminates the water demand and local air pollution of tar sand exploration totally

Energy as Collateral as finance concept (delivers debtor independent full 100% security to the financiers)

Energy as ROI as finance concept (makes energy finances inflation proof and even can be use as currency hedge)

Energy as Variable as finance concept (pulls the higher future energy prices into finance calculations)

Energy as Gold as finance concept (making energy investments to the backing corner of the monetary system)

use of energy investments as way of economic stimulus delivering structural reforms (less wealth export and more jobs)

use of energy investments as structural way to fix trade balance inequalities (without the need of currency wars)

use of energy investments as structural way to fix foreign energy dependencies (without the need of energy wars)

use of fuelless energy investments as way to create voluminous jobs (in the private sector, not in the public sector)

geothermal energy harvesting will replace nuclear fission totally (Fukushima marked the end of the nuclear renaissance)

geothermal energy harvesting will boost investments in national/continental power transmission technology/networks

geothermal energy harvesting will boost research on cold electrolysis (magnetism, catalysts, resonances and voltages)

the effects of a CME originated strong EMP in a digital era are totally underestimated (it can wipe out all powerinfra)

the effects of a CME originated strong EMP could destroy the cooling power backup in nuclear fission plants (meltdowns)

research for new wireless power transport technologies with low CAPEX/OPEX will become a huge new sector of science

the vertical earth's magnetic field lines will become the power transport medium of this millennium (tesla technology)

by high energy prices global trade will decline significant and rail transport will replace air transport significant too

energy infra tech will become also a monetary clearance structure as the kWh will rise as stable international value

use of quantitative easing fully focused on energy investments (percolating up - currency/asset value - future strength)

Planck Foundation produces analyses and models based on these issues and also is lobbying intensively for these issues.

Back to Main Site