Planck Foundation advocates regarding physical sciences:

• the core of physics is electricity/magnetism: mass/gravity combo is just a set of derivitives of electricity/magnetism
• einstein wrongly advocated a set of core derivitives as the core: a dogma has blocked progress in physics severely
• einstein's superannuated focus on the derivitives mass/gravity has detoured physics for more than a century
• both the universe and the atom are electric/magnetic driven: the mass/gravity drive has just too much loopholes
• there are no particles, there's only energy: this makes developing a valid theory of everything possible
• a proton is a positive charge/power and the base of everything
• a neutron is a positive charge/power (a 'proton') plus a negative power/charge
• nuclei are is just a cluster of numbers of these powers/charges
• the number of 'protons' in a nucleus defines the elements
• the number of 'neutrons' in a nucleus defines the isotope variants of the elements
• 'electrons' are a negative charge/power that has a binding influence on the nuclei
• an energy 'particle' based quantum physics theory (replacement of the matter particle based quantum physics theories)
• atoms of elements are just organized energy structures (and it's characterics are just consequences of that structure)
• the matter based perception (with mass and gravity as characteristics) of elements was a detour in physical sciences
• the everything is just organized energy based thesis open wide new futures for physical research/understanding/models
• current physical sciences perspectives are to much mass/gravity focused and should be more energy/electric focused
• black holes collect energy (part of it we call matter) till they explode: the cyclic universe
• every break through in physics will reveal more simplicity (as it reveals more of the whole universal design) (Feynman)
• the electron's structure gives it mass, spin, charge, magnetic moment, broglie wave, relativity and more (Robinson)
• another system of science funding (corporate sponsoring of students and not of professors grows scientific knowledge)
• the use of physical science in new energy research (nuclear fusion by magnetism/lasers and efficient energy transport)
• the use of physical science in agriculture (biophysics as an alternative/supplement to biochemicals and/or biogenetics)
• climate is such a complex system that simplifying it (CO2 as main facet) is just a sign of limited knowledge
• the cosmic radiation/gravity driven earth's core/mantle processes theory (as an addition to pressure based theory)
• the cosmic radiation/gravity driven earth's climate processes theory (alternative to the CO2 based theory)
• the IPCC models are narrow windowed and politized (consensus is politics, science is well organized scepticism)
• the IPCC models are narrow science area driven (input of geoscience, cosmoscience and waterscience is minimized)
• the regular conception within science is 'the more you know, the more you realize the less you know' (unlike IPCC)
• CO2 is one of the four pillars of life (CO2 + water H20 + sunlight + minerals = photosynthesis = O2 + flora = foodchain)
• increasing CO2 levels is widely used in agriculture to speed up photosynthesis (just a harmless atmospheric fertilizer)
• ice-caps on earth and Mars are shrinking/growing in the same rate (warming/cooling is sun/universe driven) (NASA)
• all global geo engineering plans are based on an over estimated perspective on mankind's capacity (the world is too big)
• creating nuclear events is the only geo 'engineering' mankind is capable of (which can't be labeled as engineering too)
• the growing or variable earth size theory (replacement of Wegener's in 1915 published drifting continental plates theory)
• the not-stable/more-active earth's core and mantle theory (which potentially dwarfs climate change in severe effects)
• the geological layer chaos is caused by the growing/variable earth size theory (cosmic radiation = more/less active core)
• the decay/fission/fusion rate of earth mantle/core processes is variable (and driven bij solar/cosmic radiation)
• climate change as a result of uni/geo physics and not of human behavior (doesn't change climate change nor effects)
• knowledge of urban 'heat islands' (by still air urban temperatures can be even 8 degrees C higher than in rural areas)
• knowledge of the moving of the poles (in the 21st century the north pole will travel away of America towards/on Siberia)
• knowledge of the opposite climate changes on the northern and southern hemisphere (explains local climate changes)
• ice levels on the arctic and the antarctic have always reversed quantities (see graph of antarctic ice data)
• knowledge of the Milankovitch Cycles (as the orbit of the earth around the sun has a dynamic elipse shape) (link)
• by this all Al Gore can rather be diagnosed as an autistic narrow focused politician than as a comprehensive scientist
• the effects of a strong solar originated EMP in a digital era are totally underestimated (it can wipe out all ICs)
• the abundance of hydrocarbons on Titan undermines the common excepted fossil energy origin theory severely (link)
• the a/semi biotic carbohydro origin theory (replacement of the fermented mammoths fossil hydrocarbon origin theory)
• hydrocarbons are not biology reworked by geology, but geology reworked by biology (Nikolai Kudryavtsev / Thomas Gold)
• hydrocarbons could be delivered as billion of years of cosmic dust from massive/unstable sources like the van Oort cloud
• the elements in hydrocarbons (H+C) could be manufactured by nuclear processes in earth's core / mantle
• hydrocarbons could be manufactured of elementary H+C by chemical/biological processes in earth's core/mantle
• archaea (the third branch of the phylogenetic tree) can produce hydrocarbons also in very hot/deep environments
• deep/heat biology has been proven in/around deep ocean vulcanos research (which moved scientific bounders further)
• deep elementary water has been proven by all deep drilling exploration like the Kola Superdeep Borehole (link)
• just like the spin of the earth powers ocean currents, hydrocarbons are centifugial forced towards earth's surface
• no change to the peakenergy theory by the deep oil theory (which just helps to find new/expensive oil/coal/resources)
• exploring carbo hydros could contribute to the prevention of atmospheric carbon injections and their destruction (link)
• sun activity cycle: the sun switches magnetic polarity every 11 year, with variable sun activity levels in this process)
• the 3D orbit of the planets of our solar system is the driver of the 22 year solar cycle (polarity change every 11 year)
• if sun's/earth's core activities are high each 8 minutes the magnetic system of the earth unloads to the sun (NASA)



• solar system cycle: our solar system has universe orbital driven cycles (we don't understand by our limited time window)
• the sun travels 200km/sec 124mi/sec 0.66% lightspeed through the galaxy and pulls the solar system planets along (link)
• the orbit of the planets around the sun is eliptical vortecular with a torque dynamic (not flat/centrical orbit) (link) (link)
• radiation and gravity change as the solar system travels through the galaxy (effects of these changes are yet unknow)
• the orbit of the moon is not flat but 3D too (impacting tide movements / ocean currents / earth quakes) (link)
• the perception of flat planatary solar system planet orbits are build on not taking the orbit of the sun into the picture
• as the flat earth model disappeared by new knowledge so the flat planatary orbits model will disappear too (3D orbits)
• the journey of our solar system in our the Milky Way galaxy determines solar activity and climate change
• solar activity is driven by radiation and gravity changes the galactical orbit of our solar system delivers (as is climate)
• sun polarity cycles are driven by jupiter's orbit of the sun, sun cycle intensivity is driven by saturn's orbit of the sun
• sun's heat source is not an internal thermonuclear furnace but it's huge intense external magnetic field (E. Chromie)
• solar wind is actually the magnetic field current flow that creates the plasma in its path (E. Chromie)
• phenomena that violate laws of physics under conventional logic can be explained by a magnetic sun model (E. Chromie)
• the iron/magnetic sun model will lead to a new nuclear 2.0 (magnetic) based energy generation technology for mankind
• solar activity is still often measured in sunspot numbers (subjective) but solar gauss values give 100% objective data
• sunspots numbers are inflated data for suncycles (as by modern hightech telescopes even the micros are visible) (link)
• sunspots' size/strength/timespan/latitude are more important than just sunspot numbers (counts don't give that data)
• sunspots' magnetic strengths are better quality data sources for sun intensity (can't be inflated like sunspots numbers)
• sunspots' overall magnetic strengths are inversely proportional to the magnetic field strength of the sun's north pole
• the magnetic field strength of newly produced sunspots is declining linearly year by year by ~77 gauss per year (NASA)
• measuring the sun's north pole magnetic field gives one objective (reversed/inverted) figure of sun's activity (link)
• increasing sunspot maxima equals a strengthening solar era, decreasing sunspot numbers equals a weakening solar era
• as sunspots only form by magnetic strengths of >1500 gauss: sunspots could be disappearing for some time (century)
• the sunspot number should be replaced by sun's northpole gauss value (as sun's np gauss can be measured accurately)
• the sun's northpole gauss value is increasing if the sun's activity level goes down (inverted calculation factor)
• sun's core and surface activity level is moderated by cosmic rays (the journey of the solar system in the universe)
• there's a 11 year micro suncycle and there are longer periods spanning mesa/macro cycles (larger solar periods)
• there's a direct correlation between sunactivity/sunspots and acid rain (by the intensity/volume of evaporation/rain)
• there's a correlation between sunactivity and earthpolar ozone holes (more cold turns O3 quicker back into O2) (NASA)
• as sun gauss data is just an expression of the solar activity: the 21st century could be a cold/dry/dusty/acid one
• in solar super cycle minima the sky has in the summers more clouds (less sun) and in the winters less cloud (more cold)
• the sun generate solar energy (SE), generate solar neutrinos (SN), and discharge waste products in the solar wind (SW)
• earth's core/mantle activities are moderated by cosmic rays (aka by the journey of the solar system in the universe)
• earth quake frequency/intensity is equally proportional with the easy to measure sun's poles gauss values
• microdust levels are equally proportional with sun's pole gauss values (due to less rain / more cosmic dust enterance)
• microdust levels an in low sunspot years double than regular (in 2011 total year values are already reached in May)
• sunspots/sungauss values direct effects food prices and by this inflation, economic developments, GDP and civil unrest
• sunspots/sungauss values direct effects sun based energy models like PV, CPS and wind (wind indirect is sun driven too)
• many elements are formed by the nuclear processes in the earth's inner mantle (science neglects earth's core/mantle)
• the location of our solar system in the Milky Way determines the climate on earth (drives cores/mantles of sun/earth)
• if the sun is in a hibernation period the ionosphere and the van allen belts are less strong (delivering less protection)
• the magnetosphere is not that much stable as we thought is was (breaches in it leaks more solar wind to earth) (NASA)
• less protection delivers more cosmic radiation and more cosmic dust (clouds will mature more difficult: more water vapor)
• more cosmic radiation and more cosmic dust deliver too much rain drop 'seeds': more clouds and less rain (Kirkby | CERN)
• less cloud maturing = more clouds = less sunlight = less evaporation (and by that less rain/dew) and less photosynthesis
• more incoming cosmic dust/radiation will cause more rain at sea and less rain onshore (changing hydrological system)
• ocean currents, jet streams and storms are (besides by other factors) also driven by magnetic fields changes
• this explains the unlogical air pressure phenomenon (dry air delivers higher pressure, wet air delivers lower pressure)
• earth's core/mantle contributes to the global temperature by warming oceans (different depth temperature land/ocean)
• earth's core/mantle contributes to the global temperature by CH4 emission into the atmosphere (CH4+2O2=CO2+2H2O)
• earth's core/mantle CH4 production is responsible for the massive amount of water on earth (CH4+2O2=CO2+2H2O)
• there's a direct link between sun activity (measured in sunspot frequency/sizes) and earthquakes (cosmic rays/gravity)
• there's a direct link between the journey of our solar system in the universe and earthquakes (cosmic rays/gravity)
• geothermal energy is harvesting the heat of the nuclear decay/fission/fusion processes in the earth's core/mantle
• geothermal energy can be easily harvested on the hotspots in the earth's crust (limitless, endless and riskless)
• both cosmic gravity and the combination of cosmic radiation and the ionosphere influence core/mantle/magma behavior
• the sun is an unstable remain of a supernova that exploded ~5 Gyr ago and gave birth to the solar system (image) (link)
• Kuroda/Myers combined Th/U/Pu age dating shows that a supernova made our actinide elements ~5 Gyr years ago (link)
• nuclear repulsion is the core power source of the sun (solution 33% expected neutrinos emission mistery) (O. Manuel)
• neutron repulsion powers the sun for 60%: so the sun is not only a hydrogen fusion reactor (link)
• the sun's hydrogen is generated as the 'smoke' of the core's neutron replusion process (so NR is the basic process)
• the sun's hydrogen fusion occurs in the outer magnetic field of the sun and not in it's core (LANL)
• the volume of a neutron increases by about a factor of ~(10)^23 when it goes from the solar core to become H atom
• the mass to energy convertion through neutron repulsion is greater than for uranium fission or hydrogen fusion
• neutron emission from the sun's core triggers a series of reactions that generate the sun's characteristics
• neutron emission from the sun's core deliver luminosity, solar neutrinos and an outflow of hydrogen in the solar wind
• the sun’s corona's excess temperatures are caused by the continuous collision with / bombardment of cosmic particles
• the core of the sun is hidden inside a mantle made mostly of Fe that's covered with a surface veneer of H
• the core of the sun emits as 'smoke' neutrons (which quickly decay to H) (solving the solar neutrino mystery)
• the sun's core is a neutron star (Toth in Nature in 1977), neutron repulsion is the key process of the sun (Manuel)
• the sun has not a stable 'climate' (link to NASA discovery of 2010)
• neutron repulsion is restrained by competition between attractive forces of gravity and repulsive forces of neutrons
• the sun's neutron emission generates 60% SE
• the sun's neutron decay to hydrogen produces 5% SE and 90% SW
• the sun's hydrogen fusion to helium generates 35% SE and 10% SW
• the sun discharge waste products to interstellar space is 100% SW
• when a neutron goes from the compact solar core it become an interstellar atom of hydrogen
• the entire cosmos is composed of two forms of one fundamental particle: the neutron and the hydrogen atom
• the organic/recycling/energy universe (matter = just energy, some sections are contracting and some are expanding)
• gravitational redshift could be the result of huge orbits of static clusters (Robinsons alternative for the Doppler effect)
• huge orbits of static clusters can explain apparently straight lines (the earth time perspectives/window is limited)
• the universe and every atom in it can be represented by cyclic, reversible transitions between those two forms

Planck Foundation produces analyses and models based on these issues and also is lobbying intensively for these issues.


Back to Main Site